General Trauma Abstracts (Subscribe)
Links
Traumatic Wound Debridement A Comparison Of Irrigation Methods
Traumatic Wound Debridement: A Comparison of Irrigation Methods.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 20(2):83-88, February 2006.
Draeger, Reid W BS; Dahners, Laurence E MD
Conclusions: There has been some concern regarding damage produced by high-pressure pulsatile lavage (HPPL). According to our quantitative soft tissue damage data, tissue treated by HPPL was damaged significantly more than tissue treated with bulb syringe or suction irrigation. Our qualitative tissue damage grade data showed that HPPL treated test groups appeared more damaged than other irrigation groups. Surprisingly, HPPL removed significantly less inorganic contaminant than other debridement methods, and it is proposed that HPPL may drive some contaminants deeper into the tissue rather than removing them. This study seems to support the concept that suction and sharp debridement, as practiced by most surgeons, may remove foreign bodies well without the use of HPPL.
Efficacy of Telemedicine in the Initial Management of Orthopaedic
OTA 2002 Posters OTA 2002 Posters Poster #2 Basic Science Efficacy of Telemedicine in the Initial Management of Orthopaedic
Trauma Kenneth A. Egol, MD; David L. Helfet, MD; Kenneth J.
Koval, MD; New York University-Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New
York, USA
Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis with Indomethacin Increases the
OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #20, 4:34 PM Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis with Indomethacin Increases the
Risk of Long Bone Nonunion Timothy A. Burd, MD; Michael S Hughes, BS; Jeffrey O. Anglen, MD ;
University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
Logic And Clinical Application Of Intramedullary Blocking Screws
AAOS Annual Meeting Abstract 2004
Logic and Clinical Application of Intramedullary Blocking Screws
Scientific Exhibitor Number: SE058
Hans-Werner Stedtfeld, MD, Nurnberg, Germany
Peter Landgraf, MD, Nurembeg, Germany
Mr. Andreas Ewert, Rostock, D Germany
Thomas W F Mittlmeier, MD, Rostock, Germany
Following intramedullary fixation of metaphyseal long bone fractures high rates of axial malalignment have been reported. Blocking screws have been recommended to enhance primary stability. The logic of positioning these screws, however, and the option to use them as a reduction tool have not been analysed, yet. A 2-D model of an idealized fractured long bone consists of 3 essential elements: the diaphyseal and metaphyseal fragments and a rubber band simulating soft-tissue imbalance and axial deformity. A plastic rod representing an intramedullary nail can be introduced from both sides. Plastic sticks representing blocking screws can be plugged into holes at various positions of the two 'fragments'. The model allowed to derive general rules for positioning of blocking screws valid in any metaphyseal long bone fracture. The standard position of the blocking screw is: 1. in the metaphyseal fragment 2. close to the fracture 3. at the concave side of the axial deformity. In selected situations of high-degree instability an additional screw can be placed at the short fragment, on the convex side of the deformity and distant from the fracture. The basic biomechanical effect is an intramedullary three-point fixation. Clinical application has proven validity of the rules in fractures of the proximal humerus (n = 7), the subtrochanteric area (n = 5), the distal femur (n = 9), the proximal (n = 12) and distal tibia (n = 15) which all healed uneventfully within the limits of <5° of axial deformity.
Psychological Distress among Patients with a Severe Lower Limb Injury
OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #21, 4:47 PM Psychological Distress among Patients with a Severe Lower Limb Injury Melissa L. McCarthy, ScD ; Ellen J. MacKenzie, PhD; David
Edwin, PhD; Michael J. Bosse, MD; Renan C. Castillo, MS; Adam J. Starr,
MD; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Rapid Prototyping Future of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery
OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #19, 4:28 PM Rapid Prototyping: Future of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery? George A. Brown, MD, MS ; Keikhosrow Firoozbakhsh, PhD;
Jose R. Reyna, MD; David Huberty, MD; Brenton Milner, MD; Kenna Larsen,
BS; Heather Hansen-Dispenza, BS; Rick J. Gehlert, MD; Thomas A. DeCoster,
MD; Moheb S. Moneim, MD; University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Department
of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after Orthopaedic Trauma
OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #22, 4:53 PM Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after Orthopaedic Trauma Adam J. Starr, MD ; Drake S. Borer, MD; Charles M. Reinert,
MD; Maxine Mendoza-Welch, PA-C; William H. Frawley, PhD; University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
Wound Debridement A Comparison to Two Techniques for Particle Clearance
OTA 2002 Posters OTA 2002 Posters Poster #3 Basic Science Wound Debridement: A Comparison to Two Techniques for Particle Clearance Lawrence X. Webb, MD ; Michael O. Morykwas, PhD; Tom
Smith, PhD; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, USA
Editors
- Chris Oliver
(1 vote)