My Orthopedic Surgery > Orthopedic Topics > Trauma > General > General Trauma Abstracts

General Trauma Abstracts (Subscribe)

Links

Traumatic Wound Debridement A Comparison Of Irrigation Methods

1 out of 10 stars (1 vote)

Traumatic Wound Debridement: A Comparison of Irrigation Methods. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 20(2):83-88, February 2006. Draeger, Reid W BS; Dahners, Laurence E MD Conclusions: There has been some concern regarding damage produced by high-pressure pulsatile lavage (HPPL). According to our quantitative soft tissue damage data, tissue treated by HPPL was damaged significantly more than tissue treated with bulb syringe or suction irrigation. Our qualitative tissue damage grade data showed that HPPL treated test groups appeared more damaged than other irrigation groups. Surprisingly, HPPL removed significantly less inorganic contaminant than other debridement methods, and it is proposed that HPPL may drive some contaminants deeper into the tissue rather than removing them. This study seems to support the concept that suction and sharp debridement, as practiced by most surgeons, may remove foreign bodies well without the use of HPPL.

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Efficacy of Telemedicine in the Initial Management of Orthopaedic

OTA 2002 Posters OTA 2002 Posters Poster #2 Basic Science Efficacy of Telemedicine in the Initial Management of Orthopaedic Trauma Kenneth A. Egol, MD; David L. Helfet, MD; Kenneth J. Koval, MD; New York University-Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York, USA

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis with Indomethacin Increases the

OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #20, 4:34 PM Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis with Indomethacin Increases the Risk of Long Bone Nonunion Timothy A. Burd, MD; Michael S Hughes, BS; Jeffrey O. Anglen, MD ; University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Logic And Clinical Application Of Intramedullary Blocking Screws

AAOS Annual Meeting Abstract 2004 Logic and Clinical Application of Intramedullary Blocking Screws Scientific Exhibitor Number: SE058 Hans-Werner Stedtfeld, MD, Nurnberg, Germany Peter Landgraf, MD, Nurembeg, Germany Mr. Andreas Ewert, Rostock, D Germany Thomas W F Mittlmeier, MD, Rostock, Germany Following intramedullary fixation of metaphyseal long bone fractures high rates of axial malalignment have been reported. Blocking screws have been recommended to enhance primary stability. The logic of positioning these screws, however, and the option to use them as a reduction tool have not been analysed, yet. A 2-D model of an idealized fractured long bone consists of 3 essential elements: the diaphyseal and metaphyseal fragments and a rubber band simulating soft-tissue imbalance and axial deformity. A plastic rod representing an intramedullary nail can be introduced from both sides. Plastic sticks representing blocking screws can be plugged into holes at various positions of the two 'fragments'. The model allowed to derive general rules for positioning of blocking screws valid in any metaphyseal long bone fracture. The standard position of the blocking screw is: 1. in the metaphyseal fragment 2. close to the fracture 3. at the concave side of the axial deformity. In selected situations of high-degree instability an additional screw can be placed at the short fragment, on the convex side of the deformity and distant from the fracture. The basic biomechanical effect is an intramedullary three-point fixation. Clinical application has proven validity of the rules in fractures of the proximal humerus (n = 7), the subtrochanteric area (n = 5), the distal femur (n = 9), the proximal (n = 12) and distal tibia (n = 15) which all healed uneventfully within the limits of <5° of axial deformity.

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Psychological Distress among Patients with a Severe Lower Limb Injury

OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #21, 4:47 PM Psychological Distress among Patients with a Severe Lower Limb Injury Melissa L. McCarthy, ScD ; Ellen J. MacKenzie, PhD; David Edwin, PhD; Michael J. Bosse, MD; Renan C. Castillo, MS; Adam J. Starr, MD; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Rapid Prototyping Future of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery

OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #19, 4:28 PM Rapid Prototyping: Future of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery? George A. Brown, MD, MS ; Keikhosrow Firoozbakhsh, PhD; Jose R. Reyna, MD; David Huberty, MD; Brenton Milner, MD; Kenna Larsen, BS; Heather Hansen-Dispenza, BS; Rick J. Gehlert, MD; Thomas A. DeCoster, MD; Moheb S. Moneim, MD; University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after Orthopaedic Trauma

OTA 2002 - Session 3 Session III - Polytrauma Fri., 10/11/02 Polytrauma, Paper #22, 4:53 PM Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after Orthopaedic Trauma Adam J. Starr, MD ; Drake S. Borer, MD; Charles M. Reinert, MD; Maxine Mendoza-Welch, PA-C; William H. Frawley, PhD; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Wound Debridement A Comparison to Two Techniques for Particle Clearance

OTA 2002 Posters OTA 2002 Posters Poster #3 Basic Science Wound Debridement: A Comparison to Two Techniques for Particle Clearance Lawrence X. Webb, MD ; Michael O. Morykwas, PhD; Tom Smith, PhD; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA

Review It Rate It Bookmark It

Editors

  • Chris Oliver